I suddenly
realized this intro to Harlan Ellison’s Hornbook is intended as a homage
to Claimed. There are those who see Francis Stevens, ne Bennett, ne
Barrows as a pioneer of Dark Fantasy. I wonder if that’s because the late 20th
century sub-genre is oft associated with women?
As a reader
solely of three or four tales I think a much more likely claim is as a pioneer
of heroic fantasy with a marine bent. Of her fantasy I have read that five are
set on an island; Claimed tells of an obsessive seaquest; Citadel of
Fear of a lost city on a subterranean lake set with war galleys.
The heroic stuff
is for sure not that feminine – apart from Friend Island.
Stern of
feature, bronzed by wind and sun, her age could only be guessed, but I surmised
at once that in her I beheld a survivor of the age of turbines and oil engines –
a true sea-woman of that elder time when a woman’s superiority to man had not
been so long recognized.
The two stories
I read tell of the love of a man for a woman; a courageous and foolhardy love
even unto reckless, impetuous death. Bennett writes of fighters, and
The Dusk Lady
came of a warrior people. At his rough command she sprang back out of his way,
and the fight was on. (Citadel
of Fear page 252)
The warrior
inhabits a physical universe of blood and honour, and her fantasies are really
no less sorcerous than Howard’s, whether the living demon Nacoc Coatl, or the fleetly
floating and fleetingly psychic remnants of archaic Atlantis.
Friend Island
is a not bad thematic
intro to the larger work, a sea-shantie-ish tale of a long-in-the-tooth
sea-woman’s reminiscences of being stranded on an island that seemed to respond
to her moods.
Somehow,
living there alone my natural womanly intuition was stronger than ever before
or since, and so I knowed.
The loneliness
of an island is a different kind of thing to sheer mental boredom that we
suffer from nowadays, and make one ponder. Is intuition a response to a state
of the universe – in this case an island?
What would a
friendly universe be? She first poses the question, “Is it civil or wild?” so
clearly an uninhabited island is wild. A wild universe isn’t safe – a thing of
blood and honour – but it also isn’t under the rule of order (civilization).
Civilization
always has been a merging with nature (see Rome Hyborian Bridge 2). It
cannot replace the natural cleanliness and rugged rustic pursuits of Man UNLESS
it is simply an illusion. An illusion is something that is visually convincing
(sun, perspective) but it has not the inarticulate grace and flow (of Bardot or
a beach). We are, after all, run by words (script) as never before in the
history of mankind.
Words can be
useful – descriptions as in Bennett or Howard – but they can also be pure
routine. If we live in a routine world, it cannot also be a free-flowing
inarticulate universe. The two are incompatible.
If civilization has
routines (customs, laws, edicts) it also has to have the spontaneity of free
communal expression
There are two
sides of reality; the order of a robot; the beauty of a wild beast. An island
is a physical presence – like St Tropez used to be according to BB – providing free
food, songbirds, nectar, rock pools and tidal detritus. The pleasure is of the
body to express itself wholesomely in a non rule-bound sense
That side of
civilization – that was there in the 60s from France to San Fran – that might
make it barely bearable, has never been deader. The side that merges with
nature, that lives like an island isolated from outside interference (Hong
Kong, prev.)
It’s because
civilization has become a perspective illusion that convinces the head that it
has become cutoff from the physical experience of nature (cosmos) and therefore
the psychic expression of freedom.
A non-physical
universe suffers from physical boredom and is nevertheless trapped by its own
physique. There is no escape from physique and therefore – whatever “they” tell
us – that is what the universe is.
By ignoring the
physical reality, we are permeated by facts of convincing rightness that only
exist in the heads of acolytes, irrespective of physical desirability. This “rightness”
- it has to be said – is a male thing; a compulsion – monetary, numerical,
algorithmic – of the head that is indicative of physical boredom.
An island – and particularly
the female island of the story – is a presence of physical desirability, bodily
pleasure. Intoxicating and inarticulate reality. Now, this is exactly the sort
of reality that our male politicians/acolytes of dead sorcerers are not atall
convinced by, since it’s not of the head! Therefore, they continually destroy
the thing that allows free-flowing imagination unencumbered by rule-bound
boredom.
The more
speeches you hear the more you know you are in the realm of rule-bound boredom.
What is the way out of this nightmare? Every man or woman is an island. Our
bodies are perfect and capable of country pursuits of yore (as well as sailing,
canoeing). Cowboys – and cowboy-hippies – need to get out of their heads and
onto their saddles. Yeehar!