It’s a small
world out there, as the cliquishness of 30s/40s pulp writers illustrates.
Starting from a WWII picture of Heinlein, de Camp and Asimov at Naval
Aviation Experimental Station in Philadelphia, I discovered that Heinlein
rented his house to CL Moore and her husband, Henry Kuttner.
Heinlein I know from Stranger in a Strange Land –
the space-hippy epic Paul Kantner swore by - and this massive tome might be the
Bible of rebellion against an authoritarian future of straight lines and cities
(unbroken progress of the sorcery of light Pictorial 67).
I then happened on the post space-opera era of Leigh
Brackett, especially The Long Tomorrow. It struck me that there is an
optimistic and a pessimistic side to what is almost the same future of
technological advance.
Brackett was married to Edmond Hamilton (of Weird
Tales) who became a prolific space-opera writer and joined DC (League of
Super-Heroes). The big question is if, even within spouses, future fantasy
can be either optimistic or pessimistic, what does that imply? (there was actually
a comic story in Metal Hurlant to
that effect by Angus Mackie!)
You’re really asking various questions, like:
You’re really asking various questions, like:
What is authority?
What is existence?
What is self, being?
But, there is a more basic question even than those; are you in favor of life or death? Clark Ashton-Smith (again of Weird Tales) could be said to have come down on the side of the latter, in stories punishing egotism in supernatural ways, and even HP Lovecraft labelled him a friend of decay.
What is self, being?
But, there is a more basic question even than those; are you in favor of life or death? Clark Ashton-Smith (again of Weird Tales) could be said to have come down on the side of the latter, in stories punishing egotism in supernatural ways, and even HP Lovecraft labelled him a friend of decay.
So, what I tend to say is the optimistic version of the
future doesn’t feature decay (meaning death); the pessimistic one does.
Therefore, since decay does exist, the physical reality is much more on the
side of pessimism.
That is to say, pessimism that says technological advance
is egotism. The Long Tomorrow sets these two views squarely against each
other, with “the survivors” being virtually descendants of Amish and other
sects that work the earth by means of horses and have no electricity, while
Bartorstown is the promised land of forbidden advance.
They were enormous wagons, with canvas tilts and all sorts
of things hung to their ribs inside, so they were like dim, odorous caves on
wheels.. His mind a blurred jumble of the faraway places of which the traders
spoke: the little shipping settlements and fishing hamlets along the Atlantic,
the lumber camps of the Appalachians, these endless New Mennonite farmlands of
the Midwest, the southern hunters and hill farmers, the great rivers westward
with their barges and boats, the plains beyond and the horsemen and ranches and
herds of wild cattle, the lofty mountains and the land and sea still farther
west.
The book gives a reasonable picture of the slow speaking,
Bible fearing men of the seasons, versus the clever “others” of Bartorstown
who’s siren call attracts two lads of Huck Finn persuasion (Len and Esau).
The suspicions of the Bible thumpers turn-out to be
well-founded. The “slow speaking”, full-bearded men deliver savage beatings to
Len and Esau prior to their elopement. In this case the cause of the fear was a
nuclear war that destroyed all cities, but can one say that technological
advance is a priori suspicious? Preacher Man says
“..they have loosed the sacred fire which lies at the
heart of things, and which only I, the Lord Jehovah, should dare to touch.”
Is technological advance actually retrograde because it
takes place outside of the physical reality that is born of Earth rhythms that
regenerate life? What we call “life” is actually an inferior copy of the real
thing which has a manifest destiny of physical decay and revival.
This idea of a copy or an illusion is contained in
diverse technology. Not only recording (of images, sounds) but DNA is the
machinery for copying lifeforms. This one-sided view (sun – Apollo “sacred fire”)
doesn’t include the physical reality that in nature things are balanced,
proportionate and irregular (swaying between two things, snakelike).
The serpentine backbone of things is an a priori
primitivism of the universe that is what things are – their self, being. What
technology does is filter-out all the sublime primitivism of power and meaning,
and replace it with copies that are weak.
The underlying reason for this is that Apollo is only
appearance (sun); reality is the sublime primitivism of seasons and the cycle
of life and death. Dionysus, the god of gaiety and eternal frolicking in
pastures green.
It was the strawberry festival, the first big social event of the summer,
where people who had perhaps not seen each other since the first snow could get
together and talk and pleasantly stuff themselves, sitting in the dappled
sunshine under the elms.
A crowd of boys had run out along the road to meet the wagon. They were
running beside it now, shouting up to Mr. Hostetter. The girls, and the boys
still too little to run, stood along the edges of the square and waved and
called out, the girls in their bonnets and their long skirts blowing in the
warm wind, the tiny boys exactly like their fathers in homespun and broad brown
hats. Then everybody began to move, flowing across the square toward the wagon,
which went slower and slower and finally stopped, the six great horses tossing
their heads and snorting as though they had done a mighty thing to get that
wagon there and were proud of it. (ch six)