Letting things develop instinctively introduces the savagery of muscular movements and the flow of blood, the intake of breath as eagle eyes spot their prey from afar. Yes, it's the old school play yard (SR1).
The communality of life in muddy fields is a principle factor in the mid 19th century philosophy of Transcendentalism, an American branch of Romanticism heralded by Emerson and others such as the pioneering journalist Margaret Fuller.
One could cite an origin in the state of nature of Rousseau and Voltaire (P2). Savagery has a primitive aspect of humanity, which arguably is our mammalian order. Women are the standard bearers though one would hardly know it in the modern state of affairs.
Following Chloe Kelly's shirt-ripping celebration of scoring the winning goal in the England/Germany final, Gary Lineker tweeted,
"Kelly is England's heroine, bra none"
This led to accusations of misogyny, whereas it is simply an acknowledgement of a mammalian order that women represent.
Transcendentalism is the appearance of a spiritual aspect on the process of nature; the physical process of living as a free individual. The same principle is echoed in James Fenimore Cooper a d the wilderness trapper Hawk-Eye.
The physical process, the conscientious awareness of nature, is assumed to be 'good', though one has to take in account Voltaire's Candide (P2) whereby processes that are more or less filthy - rotting and fermentation - enable metamorphosis into sweet-smelling compost, and so on.
In order for 'bad' to become 'good', or for dirt to become clean, the processes in nature have to be allowed to happen (see Buffy quote HB72.) But this is exactly what a modern state-of-mind tends not to do.
We live in corrupt rhythms that are perceived as hygienic (monocultures); the machine-fixation of variable time and numbers (ones and zeros.)
As was noted in SR1, there is a progressive development of the body that can be messy, but has a psychic strength. Instincts happen with no thought, and the body/psyche develop in tandem.
The limits to analytical reason are the functions of the body; toiletry, hormonal. Because modern science operates from the cerebrum, it ignores the primitive savagery of breath, eagle sight, flow of blood and beat of pulse.
These originate from the cerebellum (hindbrain) that attaches to spine and establishes a psychic rapport with the body in motion.
Without a psychic rapport, one exists in a cerebral system of numbers (in machine-time or variable time.) Of course, DNA is part of this system. As was previously pointed out - M2, 1/2 Essay 5 - it's logically impossible for an active body that moves antagonistically to be controlled by something that is inert (DNA.) One can't correlate movement with non-movement. The correlation is replaced by calculation that distorts natural rhythms (through ego-compulsion, number.)
Strength and will are the physical reality, and that imbues psyche. In other words, the entire process that takes place in nature in invariable time has nothing to do with DNA. It has to do with the mechanisms of the body and the associated functions. These functions attach to the cerebellum to establish a psychic rapport.
DNA is part of the parallel system of the cerebrum, number and analytical reason. It's convincing to the ego for that reason. The body exists in invariable time and must have a psychic rapport in order to function innately, as opposed to being told what to do.
This applies especially to primary school kids who's functions are developing at their own pace. The modern distortions cited on SR1 are the operations of the cerebrum denying the psychic rapport of instinctive processes (cerebellum, spine, movement.)
Distortions are inevitable in a system that does not have physical processes that are the natural state-of-affairs. The distortions are 'sold' by words (the dragon of news). The dollar becomes the word (DNA); words become numbers (the expressive algorithm.)
The future 'they' are heading towards is one of hygienic imitation (motion-capture) without the messiness and psychic rapport of nature. As with Pamela Geller's quote (SR1), the cerebral interference in processes distorts natural rhythms and one could add the difference between good and bad. Confusion reigns.
In short, bad and good are always going to be there, and natural processes are the way they are traditionally controlled. One can manage processes like a gamekeeper does on a grouse moor; the skill lies in the balance of mind and body, of disabling the ego to the benefit of the greater good.
THE PRIESTS OF THE GOLDEN BULL