If modernism is entering or progressing into a parallel reality of illusion, what is supposedly theoretical isn't theoretical atall if it corresponds to the illusory reality.
Einstein's theories are always thought of as theoretical first and experimental second but, in fact, Western science entered the illusory reality with Newton's expts on light - C4-C6.
Light is intrinsically geometrical (Faraday and the magnetic solenoid), and the universe of geometry is one of perspective observation (lenses, P56). In a universe of perspective, one can only expand into other perspective systems, such as Riemannian (General Relativity) or Minkowski (Special Relativity).
Clearly, these systems do not belong to physical reality, they are simply convincing illusions; any perspective system is hyper-realist because that is what perspective observation is.
The hyper-realism is run by machine-intelligence since that is what hyper-realism is; the physical reality is omitted and we have the perspective illusion of GPS arrays (in Riemannian space.)
A perspective system allows logic to be connected, and so appeals to the ego of acolytes of the mirror of illusions. Einstein is simply the theoretical figurehead of what is actually a hyper-realist parallel system of perspective light (electromagnetism). The theories cannot exist outside of the parallel reality.
'The logic OF proportion' (see "White Rabbit") is what exists outside of the parallel system. Or, in other words active body as opposed to the inert head.
If you want a good example of hyper-realism it's Musk's rocket-landers on steroids programmed by algorithms. Parking a rocket in such a vertical mode almost seems too realistic to exist; that's because it exists in a parallel space run by machines.
Similarly, the GPS arrays have to be calculated and run by machine-intelligence.
Parking a car could be similarly Riemannian if it's run by GPS navigation.
What I'm attempting to do, really, is to de-Einsteinize the situation and reveal it for what it is; a machine universe (see "The Airtight Garage"). Only a machine-intelligence can inhabit Riemannian space, or indeed Minkowski (CERN).
Modernday sorcerers are simply at one with the machine, whether it's a light-box from the 18th century (Newton's Knives, C4-C6) or a mega-watt booster from the 21st. They are very happy in resolved (mathematical) space and the so-called theoretical nature of it is so much hot-air (see also CL Moore "Judgement Night" prev.)
A universe of the logic OF proportion obviously contains logic (see Corneille), but just as obviously contains irregular linework and changing colours, organic shape and coordinated animation. Perspective geometry cannot produce any of that (apart from colour maybe), so basically we exist in a topsy-turvy universe. A universe of machines run by acolytes of machines (sorcerers).
The acolytes need a 'theoretical' figurehead which of course is serpent-tongue.
Without the physical animation of irregular linework, changing colours and organic shape there can be no decadence and revival,no fertile area of growth and strength,no age of ramshackle plenty. Instead, the profane serpent is loose (with viruses in spread-mode.)
Why is nature full of feuds and nastiness? Isn't it obvious? Without balance everything will become nothing.. eventually. Have a look at Linda Perry's video a couple of posts back. The dyke is used to going round the outside (or inside) track. In a world of sameness only the odd virus is left to prosper.
Without the type of ramshackle scenario previously outlined, there can be no psychic calm. With psychic calm must come a guileless type of poetry that is as much to do with song as words.
MELANIE, LOOK WHAT THEY'VE DONE TO MY SONG, MA
(I found this from Spanish singer Jeanette's cover on "Porqué Te Vas"
Without the guileless, light-hearted spirit it is not possible to rebel since the spirit is crushed. The songs still live on, thank God, but the 60s is but a hazy half-memory.
Harmonious proportions - of singers or poets - are meaningful (epistemology) and inspire higher thoughts (ontology.)
