it seems like the Sagittarius black hole could be a consequence of the galactic spin, rather than as is implied a fulcrum. The fact we can observe it isn't necessarily meaningful in terms of spin.
(A similar argument might apply to DNA being a consequence of rhythm, rather than DNA somehow being responsible for it..) - posted on swordsofreh forum
A fulcrum is a point of leverage, so one thing you assume is that a lever has a sense of proportion. IE, is it a million light years long or several kilometres?
There can be no physical leverage without proportion so, for a start, where does proportion come from? It could easily come from the shape of s galaxy that gives the overall breadth of the galaxy. You have a physical shape but, since it's already in spin, there's no need for leverage in any case!
This whole argument is reminiscent of Katie Bouman's black hole imaging (HB56). What is imaged is essentially a product of electromagnetism and computer algorithms (she's a computer-imaging engineer.) The thing that's imaged happens to be at the centre of the galaxy, since it's the centre of spin (with centripetal forces.)
It's fundamental in the sense that the shape of the galaxy dictates it; in a sense it's the asshole of the galaxy. It's an object that depends for observation on numerical fixation, somewhat like Grace Slick's quote on anal-compulsion (HB62/1). The fixation on the object is a matter of numerical compulsion.
Outside of this numerical area is the universe of rhythm and melody (etc.) A body's power has leverage owing to the sense of proportion (which is balanced artfully). This seems to be why we live in a topsy-turvy world of variable (mathematical) time, where primordial rhythms are completely distorted. This is what is called measurement - or is it in fact a parallel reality, the mirror of illusions?
Alongside this is a dark psychology of distorted natural rhythms. We are supposed to cheer modern advanced, but DNA is mainly junk that happens to be detectable by X-ray diffraction (electromagnetism). The quantification of data hides the fact that the body's irregularities and illogicaliare are able to read miscoded sequences, or 'mistakes' in the copies (see fish swarms, prev.)
The modern scene convinces the ego owing to its numerical quantification of data. If you take a census, that would be highly convincing, but it's still illusory without the physical condition of street rhythms and melodies.
If these still exist then the census must be said to be valuable. The physical reality, like a galaxy, has a mechanical life that is highly proportionate and balanced. The idea of mechanical engineering without those is a non sequitur.
Without the 'body logic' (see Corneille, the illogical borrows from the logical, prev) of balance and proportion, the modern world becomes a sort of dark farce of zeros. Instead of the primitive, instinctive reality of strength, one is continually told what to do by 'them'.
One should be free to use the words one wishes, only according to Nina Jankowicz 'disinformation' is not allowed. I take issue with this thesis; reality is quite hard to define and should be a broad spectrum.
They also want to 'protect' people from insults. Does Yidiot count as that? In short, insults are physically telling and can carry a grain of truth. The affinity of differences, antagonistic balance, as opposed to the dark psychology of sameness when words become meaningless.
The physical and primitive, instinctive truths that forestall a political entrenchment (Revivalism 1). The spin of the galaxy, the free spirit of communal antics in the dirt of the Earth.
Bob Hite has more breadth than any number of Jankowicz clones.
