Memes like genes often give out too much information. One such meme was the 'spike protein' that mRNA copies and that supposedly might build-up in cells with multiple copies. Owing to degradation of mRNA, that seems not to be the case, and in any case the spike proteins are just junk that the cell degrades.
If something is present in a cell that is not recognised it tends to be regarded as junk. I don't think it's so much that mRNA vaccines are not necessarily effective, as that they will inevitably be used over and over again as is becoming more apparent.
Why should they be necessary? It has to be because mRNA works to stimulate the immune-system quite well, but the immune-response itself is weak. Therefore, we get more shots.
What I think is happening is that, while a celli's not a cybernetic universe (being cytoplasmic organelles), it can be treated like one owing to the sheer amount of copying and duplication between RNA, DNA and viral RNA that goes on inside the cell. Insertions, deletions and pseudogenes - inactive degraded mutations - are literally rampant.
Genes are partially junk owing to the number of miscopies and duplicates that exist. It's messy in there, but the positive angle and s that it can allow for selection of new genes that may be useful elsewhere. If the process was perfect, no mutations would occur (mutations are mistakes, in a way.)
So it's not so much that mRNA insertions for the purposes of a vaccine are adding much to the mix. They get degraded and all's the same as before. It's that the cybernetic treatment of cells allows the experts to think they are getting on top of the problem (the ego becomes misguidedly confident owing to the fact the issue seems to be 'getable'.)
But, life is not cybernetic. It's a physical game of antagonistic parts - muscle-pairs - that are freely balanced and proportioned for the purposes of active pursuits (running, hunting, fishing - well, maybe not the latter, deep-sea or netting, say.)
When the body is in the game of active pursuits, life tends to be tougher and dirtier, and the emphasis on tidiness or clinical hygiene is much less. In a word, germs are probably rampant.
So, you have things like mud, animal detritus, microbes in soil. These things humans have been exposed to over evolution.
The interior of a cell is one very small part of s reality that is extremely messy. Scientists don't really like things that are messy, and so they try and treat it as a cybernetic problem with a cybernetic solution.
But this does without the strengthening materials found in soil and in messy environments that are there to tell the immune-system that there are invaders and just to be ready and active to repel in case the more dangerous critters appear.
If life is an antagonistic game, the antagonists have to be around. Mud and dirt and messy stuff contain things that are not always beneficial, and the immune-system has to be exposed to such targets.
A cybernetic system - even given the fact that it works fine on its own terms - does not do this. It leads to a sense of false safety while requiring multiple doses just to stay still.
The complexity of copying and degradation in the cell lends itself to specialisation (which inevitably includes AI) , but it is not reality. Reality is the mess outside the cell that the cell needs exposure to. This happens when activity is antagonistic, muscular and outdoorsy.
The physical reality is also an inducement to psychic health. Both these doors are closed by the specialised doctrine of treating cells as cybernetic machines rather than as simply one small part of a messy reality.
The physical universe - or the natural one - is superior to any invented one for the fact that it has the uninhibited spark of creativity. Creativity in nature comes from the antagonistic motion of pairs of muscles - the world of action.
Man's brain has its uses in cultural advance - seemingly away from nature and into a cyberverse - but only if the cyberverse is s inherently superior can it be thought of as a true advance, and may instead be retrograde.
At this point, I have to admit that Raducanu's performance in winning 10 matches to take the US title has settled the issue for me. The ability not to think and just to act is an Oriental superiority that was previously demonstrated by Bruce Lee (Jeet Kune Do, prev.)
Training inhibits pure action because the thinking brain is over-reliant on routines. There is a limit to training, and that limit is when the brain merely acts to tactically adjust the body - which is then unleashed from thought.
The ability not to think but to act in what is a tactically superior position gave Raducanu the edge. The weakness of Western training methods that rely on strength and routine was exposed.
I put this down to an Oriental superiority of inner belief in the ability of the body; the lightning spark of creativity is unleashed.
The body is not a reasoning machine, it is a graceful product of antagonistic tension of opposites. If she had fallen, one might then have thought that perhaps the universe of cybernetic reasoning machines is as good or better, but she didn't.
Of course, you're entitled to ask why China in general doesn't do that well at tennis. Because they're not behaving in a very Chinese way! Their methods of training are routine and more routine.
The method of development inevitably leads to a false value of progress that inhibits free-flow. Free-flow is what a body in active, superior mode does with muscular athleticism (Nadia Comaneci). Training can only prepare it for that occasion, then the body's mechanisms take-over.
Scientists who study cells are simply imagining a parallel cybernetic universe that doesn't exist in reality. Reality is the physical condition of the muscular body-in-motion that has superior grace.
The scientific mind is looking through the reflection of a mirror of illusions that gives out the 'facts' of cellular mechanisms. But these are small facts compared to the facts of a body-in-motion, hunting or playing in the field amongst other creatures and the soil and plantlife of Mother Earth.
As has been stated previously the active life has its own empirical tradition derived from the tradition of living alongside nature, and in places of power. Fertility, strength, mineral, spring (see HB2).
The superiority of this world to the West's scientific illusion of empirical reason (induction, Newton) has been verified by the games witnessed a week or so since.
inspired by the royal 'R' (Raducanu, match)
